GPL Violation?

[Harald Welte]

On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 10:05:38AM -0300, chentschel at arnet.com.ar wrote:
> Mensaje citado por: Harald Welte <laforge at gpl-violations.org>:
> 
> > well, that tool (which I rearely use anymore) just gives you a rough
> > idea.  all the results you provide below are bogus.
> Is there anything more helpfull? 

no, basically you need to manually filter the 'false positives' from the
real ones, i.e. ignore all the invalid version/revision numbers, etc.

> I think i\'\'ll need to open and look for a serial :( 

well, I wouldn't assume there was linux on the box after the magic_ofs
results you got, and the OS fingerprint below.

> > Also, you have to use the MAGIC environment variable to use the provided
> > \'magic\' file, not your system-wide installation which gives even more
> > false positives.
> Yes, i actually did it. Used the magis file provided at the svn.

oh, sorry :(

-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge at gpl-violations.org>       http://gpl-violations.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.gnumonks.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20051027/92cfa4d7/attachment.pgp