<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2009/8/5 Armijn Hemel <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:armijn@uulug.nl">armijn@uulug.nl</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 02:08 +0200, paolo del bene wrote:<br>
> I am sorry for you but time ago, busybox was violated, and you can<br>
> imangine<br>
> which is its own license: <a href="http://www.busybox.net/license.html" target="_blank">http://www.busybox.net/license.html</a><br>
<br>
</div>No shit...<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> BusyBox is licensed under the GNU General Public License, version<br>
> 2about<br>
> µClinux i can tell you that is GNU LIBRARY GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE, but<br>
> they<br>
> have not say which version, i suppose is the version 2 as i found on<br>
> <a href="http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/library.txt" target="_blank">http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/library.txt</a> but i think that<br>
> is<br>
> better to ask to Erik Andersen <<a href="mailto:andersen@codepoet.org">andersen@codepoet.org</a>><br>
><br>
> Please invite Erik Andersen to clarify which GNU Library General<br>
> Public<br>
> License they actually are using.<br>
<br>
</div>But it is not part of the GNU *project*, which was my entire point. Now,<br>
this has nothing to do with licensing, just with religion and<br>
boneheadedness, so let's stop the discussion, ok?<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
armijn<br>
<br>
--<br>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
<a href="mailto:armijn@uulug.nl">armijn@uulug.nl</a> | <a href="http://www.uulug.nl/" target="_blank">http://www.uulug.nl/</a> | UULug: Utrecht Linux Users Group<br>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
</div></div></blockquote><div>you are doing all yourself, you started, not i, remember this <br></div></div><br>