Fwd: Bug#651624: is zfs incompatible with the GNU Project ?
Paolo Del Bene
id3rfix at gmail.com
Mon Apr 9 00:52:11 CEST 2012
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Paolo Delbene <id3rfix at gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 05:31:26 +0000
Subject: Re: Bug#651624: is zfs incompatible with the GNU Project ?
To: rms
mr. Edward Tomasz Napierała told:
what do you think about richard ?
happy hacking paolo
2012/2/9, Edward Tomasz Napierała <trasz at freebsd.org>:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 09:09:24PM +0100, Paolo Delbene wrote:
>> Paolo Delbene
>> <id3rfix at gmail.com> 07 febbraio 2012 02:47
>> A: debian-bsd <debian-bsd at lists.debian.org>
> FreeBSD license _is_ a BSD license. It's just there are three kinds
> of BSD license, and some of FreeBSD code is four-clause.
> Yes, it's a known problem with GPL, which seems to have been deliberately
> made incompatible with licenses that are not subset of it. Still, it's
> not a problem, since there is hardly any useful code licensed under GPL
> in the FreeBSD kernel. There were three sound card drivers, but they
> were cleaned from GPL in 10-CURRENT.
> Simply because ZFS works.
> For AdvFS to be useful, it would have to be ported to FreeBSD first.
> Also, this would make FreeBSD the sole consumer of this code (ZFS
> is being used in other systems, e.g. Illumos). This would also mean
> adding GPL-ed code to FreeBSD, which is not really desired.
> Also, AdvFS and LVM are nowhere of being functionally equivalent to ZFS.
More information about the legal
mailing list