twaffle at gmail.com
Tue Aug 16 01:18:18 CEST 2011
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
<luke.leighton at gmail.com> wrote:
> apologies, thomas - it's in the subject line. i sometimes forget
> that some mailers don't present subjects with the same priority as the
> body wrt URLs. here it is again, so that your mailer will create an
> automatic hyperlink out of it:
:-D I actually felt like a dolt, I generally don't pay as much
attention to the subject line as the first line of the message.
> i'm doing my best but it's like swatting a swarm of flies, and, as
> people on this list know full well i'm not known for being tactful -
> more like brutally honest... ho hum :)
Actually, I didn't find the article to be all that bad. We all know
these guys aren't complying. But users can scream, kick, and moan all
they want. Until the actual owners attempt to enforce it, until
someone claims infringement, there's not much to say or do.
What I dislike is linking 'android' directly with the infringement.
Linux/GPL infringement is nothing new. Lists abound of devices having
nothing to do with Android which are just as long. :-(
More information about the legal