GPL & "non profit use only"

[Thomas Charron]

On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Iain Barker <ibarker at aastra.com> wrote:

>
> IANAL, but in my view whether such a clause is valid depends on context
> and exactly how the additional restrictions are written.
> Something such as the above, if written such that it doesn't change the
> original GPL V2 license but just acts as a 'dual license' wrapper around
> it or a preamble to the main GPL license, then the above argument is
> null.
>
>
  That is exactly what I've always interpreted  these sort of additions.

-- 
-- Thomas
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gpl-violations.org/pipermail/legal/attachments/20100315/983d254a/attachment.htm>