GPL & "non profit use only"

[Caroline Ford]

Also a link back requirement. Don't think you can qualify the GPL by  
adding additional or contradictory terms.

Sent from a mobile device.

On 15 Mar 2010, at 19:02, Janez Pers <janez.pers at fe.uni-lj.si> wrote:

> Just a short check. I bumped into such things
> more than once, and would like to clean this
> issue up.
>
> If the code is GPL (and even says "V2 or later"!),
> then a restriction on "non profit use only"
> is meaningless, right?
>
> For example:
>
> http://cvlab.epfl.ch/~tola/open_source.html
>
>