LG violates GPL?

[Thijs Triemstra | Collab]

Ehm, providing the source upon request only is a violation isn't it?  
It should be available through a public http/ftp site right?

Cheers,

Thijs

On 7 Oct 2009, at 02:53, Kim Kyoungae wrote:

> Hello.
>
> My name is Kyoungae Kim and I am dealing with the open source  
> license compliance at LG electronics.
>
> We use open source code for some of our products and we mention that  
> on the manual.
> Also we provide source code if it is requested via opensource at lge.com.
>
> For your information, we have already provided the source code to  
> thinkliberty who wrote concerns about LGE's OpenSource license  
> policy at digg.com
>
> Please feel free to contact opensource at lge.com if you have any  
> questions.
>
> Thanks
>
> Kyoungae Kim.
>
> On Oct 6, 2009, at 7:59 PM, Valent Turkovic wrote:
>
>> http://digg.com/linux_unix/GPL_violator_LG_refuses_to_release_their_linux_source_code
>>
>> I found the link and thought to bring it to your attention. Is  
>> anybody
>> aware of LG not providing source code with their products that use
>> Linux?
>>
>> Cheers!
>>
>> -- 
>> pratite me na twitteru - www.twitter.com/valentt
>> http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/
>> linux, blog, anime, spirituality, windsurf, wireless
>> registered as user #367004 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org 
>> .
>> ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic, msn:  
>> valent.turkovic at hotmail.com
>>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.gpl-violations.org/pipermail/legal/attachments/20091007/cbd59c38/attachment.pgp