Fwd: mysql

Thomas Charron twaffle at gmail.com
Sat May 30 01:45:27 CEST 2009


On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Armijn Hemel <armijn at uulug.nl> wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 00:33 +0200, paolo del bene wrote:
>> i never insulted you, now i send copy of the e-mail to policeman,
>> Richard
>> Matthew Stallman, to Minister of Communications, i wait in an hurry
>> your
>> apologies.
> Alright, quit it you guys, because there is no need for this.

  I took it off list.  *shrug*  He had sent another message which was
entirely wrong, spouting off the benifits of the GPL, but then using
mSQL and Postgresql as examples, neither of which is licensed under
the GPL.

  Below is the original message, which prompted the conversation:

------ Included message:
From: paolo del bene <ninuxpdb at gmail.com>
Subject: Fwd: mysql
To: twaffle at gmail.com

if is GNU General Public License, they can use the GNU General Public
License to sell the software  is n to true ?



dual license, blah, at this point i prefeer postgree and msql, but not mysql.


and then if a software is GNU General Public License, you can not to
take the source code,
close the project and to sell with a non free software commercial license.

is more less offensive if they realize a fork for one of two projects,
but it is not a good things for any user, developer...

the hackers develop source code, they close the project and then sell
the software
with the same modifications that are distributed too under the GNU
General Public License.

At this point why to use a non free software ? will be a software the
day that will be released only as GNU General Public License.

i try to use it on GNU/linux Deb-Ian but nothing happen, bye bye mysql !!!!

better postgree and msql


-- 
-- Thomas




More information about the legal mailing list