Is this a breach of Licence

[Thomas Charron]

On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 6:42 AM, Greg Soper<greg.soper at salesagility.com> wrote:
> A company we are aware of has rebranded vTiger and passed it off as there
> own software.
>
> vTiger is covered by the SugarCRM Public Licence and by a derivation of the
> MPL, the vtiger Public License Version 1.0
> http://www.vtiger.com/products/crm/vtiger-public-license.html
>
> Does this allow me to lift the codebase wholesale, stick my logo on it and
> pass it off as my own work, or does this clause come into play from the
> above licence?

  I think this may be the wrong list to ask, as this list is generally
GPL specific, however..

  IANAL, however.  What you quoted isn't a 'way out'.  It says if you
modify it, you have to describe the changes when you send the source
code alongside of the executable.  In your case, this is PHP, however,
so the sources *are* the executable.  Now, if they rip the *license*
out of the sources as well, that's a different ball game.

-- 
-- Thomas