LGPL v2 section 6 loophole?

[Thomas Charron]

On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Sitaram Chamarty<sitaramc at gmail.com> wrote:
> OK, I'll rephrase my question: can the closed source app actively
> include measures to *prevent* something working which would otherwise
> have worked, and still be compliant with LGPL v2?

  Yes.  It's pretty strait forward.  There are also situations where
an LGPL library may not even *be* physically replacable. (i.e.:
Embedded Systems with no real file system)

-- 
-- Thomas