Is it possible/impossible to develop proprietary software to run on linux?

[paolo del bene]

2009/8/5 Armijn Hemel <armijn at uulug.nl>

> On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 02:08 +0200, paolo del bene wrote:
> > I am sorry for you but time ago, busybox was violated, and you can
> > imangine
> > which is its own license: http://www.busybox.net/license.html
>
> No shit...
>
> > BusyBox is licensed under the GNU General Public License, version
> > 2about
> > µClinux i can tell you that is GNU LIBRARY GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE, but
> > they
> > have not say which version, i suppose is the version 2 as i found on
> > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/library.txt  but i think that
> > is
> > better to ask to Erik Andersen <andersen at codepoet.org>
> >
> > Please invite Erik Andersen to clarify which GNU Library General
> > Public
> > License they actually are using.
>
> But it is not part of the GNU *project*, which was my entire point. Now,
> this has nothing to do with licensing, just with religion and
> boneheadedness, so let's stop the discussion, ok?
>
> armijn
>
> --
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> armijn at uulug.nl | http://www.uulug.nl/ | UULug: Utrecht Linux Users Group
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
you are doing all yourself, you started, not i, remember this
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gpl-violations.org/pipermail/legal/attachments/20090805/8c8de143/attachment.htm>