various ways of using CMS

[Vedran Vucic]

Hello,

Ok, I understand that distinction between the distributed source code and
obvious presence of  some software is maybe legally different.

I was especially struck by this, since example that I mention is done by one
magazine that deals with brands.
Thus, if someone deals with brands, it should be expected that they respect
brands and take care on ways how they use brands, display their names and
licensing information.


With best wishes,


Vedran

On 7/25/07, Garret Acott <garret at holonyx.com> wrote:
>
> I understand what you are saying, but the reality is that there may be
> many different licenses involved. As a matter of fact, this has been the
> subject of recent debate over at Joomla, specifically in relation to
> commercial software or "modules/extensions" being used with Joomla.
>
> One of the primary ideas of Open Source software is just this, that the
> SOURCE is open and available for anybody to look at. You should be able
> to download open source software, look at the code itself, and clearly
> see which license it is distributed under.
>
> Garret
>
> Vedran Vucic wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > It is clear to me when content of web site is concerned. But, whole
> > functionality of site is due to functionality of CMS.  Thus, use of
> > menus, mailing, log in, use of modules (i.e. random photo...) and
> > other functions are use of code of  CMS itself.
> > Thus, avoiding to mention that and under which license is published is
> > from my point of view dubious.
> >
> > Anyway, thanks for help.
> >
> >
> > best wishes,
> >
> >
> > vedran
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.gpl-violations.org/pipermail/legal/attachments/20070725/b2de6629/attachment.htm