[Fwd: Re: Charging ($20) for GPL source?]

Bennett, Robert P Robert.Bennett at ca.com
Mon Jan 8 17:26:09 CET 2007


That's correct.  Even the fsf charges for source code on cd:

http://www.gnu.org/order/source18.html



> -----Original Message-----
> From: legal-bounces at lists.gpl-violations.org 
> [mailto:legal-bounces at lists.gpl-violations.org] On Behalf Of 
> Shane M. Coughlan
> Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 11:06 AM
> To: GPL Violations
> Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: Charging ($20) for GPL source?]
> 
> 
> Arnoud Engelfriet wrote:
> > Matthew Flaschen wrote:
> >> Btw. i would not pay $1, even if i am interested. Is it 
> open source 
> >> or not? In the moment i pay for the sources so i think its better 
> >> called "paid source".
> > 
> > It's open source because of the rights the recipient gets when he 
> > obtains the source. It's not open source because you get it 
> for free.
> 
> Arnoud makes a very good point here.  Free Software is about 
> the freedom it gives the user, not price.  There is no 
> obligation to deliver Free Software at zero cost, nor to 
> provide the source code at zero cost (though there is an 
> obligation to provide the source code).
> 
> Shane
> 
> -- 
> Shane Coughlan
> FTF Coordinator
> Free Software Foundation Europe
> +41435000366 ext 408
> coughlan at fsfeurope.org
> Support Free Software > http://fsfe.org
> 
> 
> 



More information about the legal mailing list