[Fwd: Re: Charging ($20) for GPL source?]
Bennett, Robert P
Robert.Bennett at ca.com
Mon Jan 8 17:26:09 CET 2007
That's correct. Even the fsf charges for source code on cd:
http://www.gnu.org/order/source18.html
> -----Original Message-----
> From: legal-bounces at lists.gpl-violations.org
> [mailto:legal-bounces at lists.gpl-violations.org] On Behalf Of
> Shane M. Coughlan
> Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 11:06 AM
> To: GPL Violations
> Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: Charging ($20) for GPL source?]
>
>
> Arnoud Engelfriet wrote:
> > Matthew Flaschen wrote:
> >> Btw. i would not pay $1, even if i am interested. Is it
> open source
> >> or not? In the moment i pay for the sources so i think its better
> >> called "paid source".
> >
> > It's open source because of the rights the recipient gets when he
> > obtains the source. It's not open source because you get it
> for free.
>
> Arnoud makes a very good point here. Free Software is about
> the freedom it gives the user, not price. There is no
> obligation to deliver Free Software at zero cost, nor to
> provide the source code at zero cost (though there is an
> obligation to provide the source code).
>
> Shane
>
> --
> Shane Coughlan
> FTF Coordinator
> Free Software Foundation Europe
> +41435000366 ext 408
> coughlan at fsfeurope.org
> Support Free Software > http://fsfe.org
>
>
>
More information about the legal
mailing list