Snort Patch

[Anti Matter]

Hi Ken,

Ok that makes is all clear. I guess someone should have just said that
from the beginning.  Ive attached part of your press release below
though. I mean from that subject line and content it appears you had
written your own.

Thanks again!

AmbironTrustWave Releases Snort Fix

CHICAGO — June 5, 2006 - AmbironTrustWave, a leading developer and
marketer of intrusion prevention system (IPS) technology, today
announced that it has fixed a flaw in the open source Snort engine.

On 9/20/06, Ken Green <KGreen at atwcorp.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Just to be clear.... Our Press Release announced a fix to our product,
> which uses Snort. The fix was accomplished with the Demarc patch, not a
> new patch developed at ATW.
>
> Hope this clarifies the situation.
>
> Ken
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anti Matter [mailto:antimatter at gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 1:23 PM
> To: Info Sales; Annapolis Sales; Support; Ken Green;
> legal at lists.gpl-violations.org
> Subject: Fwd: Snort Patch
>
> Hi,
>
> Can someone please tell me whats going on. I was given a patch from Ken
> that was supposed to be "your fix" as announced in your press release.
> That patch is from another company. Im not sure if you were trying to
> trick me here or your trying to pass off someone elses code as your own.
>
> I think we are all aware that Snort is gpl and under that license you
> are required to provide the modifications to the source code. I would
> like to be provided with the entire source code you use with ipAngel so
> that I can verify what is going on.
>
> Please comply with the GPL
>
> Thanks
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Anti Matter <antimatter at gmail.com>
> Date: Sep 18, 2006 3:43 PM
> Subject: Snort Patch
> To: Ken Green <KGreen at atwcorp.com>
>
>
> Hi Ken,
>
> I tried to contact you last week regrarding the patch info you sent me
> but I did not hear back from you. Like I had said that appeared to be a
> previously published patch by another company. I already have 2 of the
> patches out there. Both have weaknesses. Your news article states that
> you fixed Snort and I would like to get this patch.
>
> Unless you saying you used another vendors patch and claimed it as your
> own?
> Is this the patch your are distributing with your code?
>
> - AM -
>