XTCommerce Violation?

[David A. Desrosiers]

On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 10:12 -0400, Matthew Flaschen wrote:

> > It would be peculiar if they forbade distribution of their
> > *unmodified* software unless the name was changed first. 
> > Is that what you are describing? 

> I know that's what RedHat does.

This is often called a "Lanham Act" violation, iirc. or "False
designation of origin". 


-- 
David A. Desrosiers
desrod gnu-designs com
http://gnu-designs.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.gnumonks.org/pipermail/legal/attachments/20060912/882f45bb/attachment.pgp