Build Scripts and GPL
Robert Schwebel
r.schwebel at pengutronix.de
Fri May 19 15:22:05 CEST 2006
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 08:52:21AM -0400, David A. Desrosiers wrote:
> I'm not sure you want to release your GPL code under a Public Domain
> license at all, unless you truly aren't interested in the copyright that
> currently binds it.
>
> Using the GPL in the first place, makes me think you care about
> copyright (or you wouldn't be on this list, right? ;)
>
> If you wanted to relicense it in a way that was amicable to both, you
> could choose the BSD license, retain copyright (and still be able to
> legally enforce it), and let anyone use it however they wish, free or
> commercially.
Please read my previous text before answering. The GPL was selected with
intent, but my doubt was that a license could be useless if "scripts
necessary to compile/install" wouldn't be touched by it.
Robert
--
Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de
Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686
Hannoversche Str. 2, 31134 Hildesheim, Germany
Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-9
More information about the legal
mailing list