Inprocomm and their module

[Harald Welte]

On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 09:43:57PM +0100, Carlos Martín wrote:
> On Friday 13 January 2006 17:48, Carlos Martín wrote:
> > I'll send them an e-mail asking if they have info. This particular chip was 
> > apparently subcontracted from InProcomm by Linksys, which is why lspci says 
> > the device is a Linksys INPROCOMM IPN2220. Maybe they also got the docs. I 
> > don't think it's very likely, since the driver code is copyright InProcomm, 
> > so they probably just got the finished pack.
> 
> Just an update to this.
> 
> I talked to Linksys support and they say they can't disclose anything else 
> than the specifications (the PDF they have in their webpage) so I guess it'll 
> have to be reverse engineer.
> 
> MediaTek never answered.
> 
> I'll send the letter in a few days. Would it be better if it's Linksys Spain 
> or Linksys US?

I would send it to Linksys US, since spanish subsidiary would probably
only pass it on to the US.

Good luck!

-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org>          	        http://gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.gpl-violations.org/pipermail/legal/attachments/20060208/936d23ba/attachment.pgp>