Charging ($20) for GPL source?
Robert Brockway
rbrockway at opentrend.net
Sat Dec 16 22:13:17 CET 2006
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Omar Kaminski wrote:
> Ok, I agree. But it is a difficult for any who lives in another country, for
> example.
>
> So it's almost simililar to not making the source-code avaliable.
IANAL. Now I've got that out of the way...
As others have stated what the company is doing (as described) is
permissible within the GPL. Remember though that the GPL permits you (or
me, or everyone) to put the binary and source on a web site and offer it
for download at no cost.
But don't take my word for it:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#DoesTheGPLRequireAvailabilityToPublic
This has always struck me as one of the most important defences for
keeping software free (as in beer). In essence it only takes a minority
of people to want to give away software at no cost for the effective
market cost (in money) of the software to be zero or near zero.
Cheers,
Rob
--
Robert Brockway B.Sc. Phone: +1-905-821-2327
Senior Technical Consultant Urgent Support: +1-416-669-3073
OpenTrend Solutions Ltd Email: support at opentrend.net
Web: www.opentrend.net
More information about the legal
mailing list