Belkin's Legal Violations

[Quantum Scientific]

I just don't believe how several people here are fighting my efforts to cause 
Belkin to release their proper source!  This is irrational, and in obvious 
contravention of the purpose of GPL-Violations.org .  

"Ruin things", LOL... what ever are you talking about?  'Fixing things' and 
standing up for the actual contributors is what I am doing. 

Why would you oppose, Belkin's being brought into compliance with the GPL?  
Belkin is breaking the law, and is actively trying to -deflect- corrective 
efforts!  This is why I believe exemplary damages would be awarded in this 
case.  I am gathering information now;  thanks for coming out.

If it were one person opposing us, I would say it's mental illness.  But since 
it's three+, it appears to be a coordinated effort by Belkin or Broadcom, and 
I think this deserves special scrutiny as these are corrupt and dishonest 
tactics.  I would submit to the DA, but the standard of proof is easier in a 
civil trial.

Carl Cook 



On Monday 30 May 2005 7:44, Hongkun Yin wrote:
> I just don't believe you actually did not read. 
> Felix explained it in such a detail, and things are
> quite clear, the parts you mentioned are not GPL
> parts, you can not require so much from anybody, and
> you have no right to ruin things and make the actual
> contributors feel bad about GPL.